Corporate Governance
- Proxy & CD&A production
- Say-on-pay strategy & shareholder engagement
- ISS & Glass Lewis positioning
Boutique counsel on the full arc of compensation governance — corporate governance and proxy, benefit plan fiduciary matters, and compensation-deal negotiation — for a fixed fee.
One team, senior attention, aligned with boards and executives alike.
Practice
We think about compensation governance as one integrated practice. Public-company boards answer to shareholders (and their advisors) on executive pay. Plan fiduciaries answer to participants and the DOL on 401(k) and health plan oversight. Executives and companies negotiate the deals that make all of it real. OckerGibbs advises across all three — on a fixed fee.
Representative engagements over 25+ years.
Anchor Case Study
A mid-cap issuer came off a failed say-on-pay vote with an ISS "Against" recommendation and fractured investor confidence. We rebuilt the pay narrative from the ground up — reframing the CD&A, tightening the peer group, and leading a direct engagement campaign with the top holders ahead of the annual meeting.
Ben and Jon produce best-of-peer proxies because they know how to communicate a company’s message in a simple, clear, and compelling manner.
People
Partner · Corporate Governance & Compensation Deals
"The say-on-pay doctor."
Jon has advised public-company boards and executives on compensation governance for more than 25 years, previously at Pillsbury and Orrick. He is known for diagnosing troubled pay programs, rebuilding the narrative shareholders will support, and negotiating the CEO-level deals that anchor them.
Read full bio →Partner · Proxy & Benefit Plan Governance
Virtual in-house project management.
Ben leads proxy and CD&A production and advises plan committees on ERISA fiduciary matters, running each engagement like an embedded in-house team. He brings compensation governance depth together with proxy craft to keep complex disclosure and plan projects on schedule and on message.
Read full bio →Insights
Boards should maintain robust compensation disclosure, engage shareholders, align on priorities, and document discretion despite relaxed rules and weaker proxy-advisor influence.
The changes worth stress-testing before your next pay decision — from performance-period design to burn-rate methodology.
Reframing a single narrative section — the CEO pay decision rationale — flipped the recommendation. Here is what changed, and why the same fix works elsewhere.
Contact
For boards & plan committees
Board, comp committee, and plan committee counsel across proxy, ERISA, and shareholder engagement — on a fixed fee.
jon@ockergibbs.com →For executives & hiring companies
Employment, severance, and change-in-control terms — reviewed and negotiated by senior counsel, on either side of the table.
ben@ockergibbs.com →